Liberation of the kursk region or nuclear armageddon

[الزمزوم]

LIBERATION OF THE KURSK REGION OR NUCLEAR ARMAGEDDON

27.09.2024
Aleksandr Dugin
The September 25 session of the Russian Security Council, at which Vladimir Putin announced changes to our country's nuclear doctrine (entitled “Fundamentals of State Policy in the Field of Nuclear Deterrence”), is an extremely important event. It is worth noting that the nuclear doctrine introduces the following innovation: participation in aggression against Russia by any non-nuclear state, if supported by a nuclear state, will be regarded as a joint attack on the Russian Federation

This is a fundamental point, according to which our President no longer simply reserves the right to use nuclear weapons as the Supreme Commander-in-Chief. Now, if our country is attacked by a non-nuclear state with the support of a nuclear state, he not only can respond according to the entire logic of nuclear confrontation, but will be obliged to do so

Let's take a closer look: are we talking about the future or the present? At this moment we have an act of direct aggression against the Kursk region. An invasion by a non-nuclear Ukraine, hostile to us, with the support and direct participation of a nuclear state. This means that we are recording an act of a joint attack on the Russian Federation by the NATO bloc, the United States and Ukraine

Of course, at the same time there are four other subjects joined to Russia against which Ukraine is carrying out aggression; but in the case of the Kursk region, we now have not only the right but also the obligation to go to war with the NATO bloc, and the same will apply to any violation of the territorial integrity of Belarus, our Union State

In other words, from the moment of adopting the new version of the nuclear doctrine, it is necessary to recognize that Russia is at war with the NATO bloc. Because there is a certain fact of aggression against Russia by the Ukrainian regime with the support of a nuclear state. And now, whether we like it or not, according to our nuclear doctrine, we are forced to enter into a real conflict with the NATO bloc and the United States

Again, this is more than serious: we are actually facing the need to go to war, not in situations that may arise one day, but which are already a known fact

Therefore, today, in order to avoid a nuclear apocalypse, that is, Russia's entry into a direct nuclear confrontation with NATO, there is only one way out. The immediate withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the Kursk region. Immediately, because any further stay in that region, if they continue to be supported by the United States and NATO, will simply be the inevitable beginning of a nuclear war. Not because we simply decided so, but because we adopted such amendments to our nuclear doctrine

Of course, many will try to soften this rigidity. But the point is that these are no longer “red lines”, but in fact a decision on nuclear Armageddon. In any other document, including the National Security Strategy, amendments could be interpreted differently, but when such a clause is adopted in our nuclear doctrine, we leave ourselves no choice

Yes, this is a very serious action and a very serious document What happened today is probably a turning point in history. Because now, under the circumstances, we can no longer avoid a direct confrontation with NATO